Daniel B. Garrie
He explains what AI-generated evidence, deepfakes and cyberwarfare actually mean for the people who have to make decisions about them — boards, security leaders, and courts.
The fastest way to judge a speaker is to watch one. Start with the TEDx talk.
Each runs as a keynote, a workshop or a moderated conversation, and is rebuilt around the room it is given in.
Boards, general counsel, litigators
Anyone can now manufacture a convincing recording of anyone saying anything. Courts, investigators and companies are still deciding what to do about it.
Keynote, workshop, fireside
General and policy audiences
The TEDx talk. Decades into the problem, there is still no working legal definition of an act of cyberwar — and you cannot deter what you cannot define.
Keynote, fireside
Directors, executives, CISOs
Directors carry legal exposure from the moment an incident starts, and most of the decisions that determine that exposure get made in the first forty-eight hours.
Keynote, board session, workshop
Judges, litigators, expert witnesses
Technical disputes are won and lost on whether the decision-maker understands the technology. Usually nobody has made it their job to explain it.
CLE, judicial education, workshop
In-house counsel, litigators, ADR programmes
When a technical dispute stalls a case, a special master is often what unsticks it. Few people outside the role know how that work actually gets done.
Keynote, CLE, panel
Awaiting content
Past events and venues go here. This space is intentionally empty rather than filled with placeholder examples — nothing on this site claims an appearance that did not happen.
Awaiting content
Quotes from event organisers go here, used verbatim and with attribution.
Daniel B. Garrie sits in the seat where law and technology collide, and has done for most of his career. He is a neutral at JAMS, serving as arbitrator, mediator and court-appointed special master in disputes that turn on evidence most lawyers cannot read. He founded Law & Forensics, teaches at Harvard as an adjunct professor, and holds four U.S. patents in cybersecurity forensic technology.
He has written seven books, published by the American Bar Association, Thomson Reuters and the Federal Judicial Center among others, including a guide to software written specifically for judges. He founded and edits the Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare.
He is a useful speaker for the same reason he is a useful neutral: he has to explain hard technical material to people who need to make a decision about it, and be understood the first time.
Fellow of the Academy of Court Appointed Neutrals. Distinguished Neutral, CPR Institute. Fellow, Ponemon Institute.
J.D., Rutgers School of Law. M.A. Computer Science with honours. Brandeis University.
Leading Forensics & eDiscovery Expert by the New York Law Journal. Honorary admittance, Federal Court of Claims.
Speaking is one part of it. Organisations reach him for these too.
Arbitrator, mediator and court-appointed special master, through JAMS.
Full JAMS profileDigital forensics, incident response and expert testimony at Law & Forensics.
Law & ForensicsOn digital evidence, cybersecurity, eDiscovery and software for the courts.
All titlesFounder and editor of the Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare, and a long list of articles.
Google ScholarTell him about the event and the room. He will come back to you directly about fit, format and availability.
Prefer email? info@lawandforensics.com
Organisers who need to circulate him internally can use the speaker kit.
